“If you accept their amendment, you are embarrassing all of us,” the Crosby Republican said in an electronic mail message to House members after the House’s Constitutional Revision Committee approved the substitution late Thursday.
“Kill the d--- bill if you want, or table it, or hide it in the cafeteria,” Andrist wrote in his e-mail. “Anything that will spare us this stupidity.”
|
Advertisement |
“I had nothing to do with it,” said Carlson, who went past Andrist at the door of Senate Majority Leader Bob Stenehjem’s office as Carlson was leaving a meeting with Stenehjem.
“I know where it came from. I don’t have to believe it. Something like that could only come from one place,” Andrist said a few moments later. “Who is running the House? That’s where it came from.”
Andrist’s original proposal sought to amend the North Dakota Constitution to establish a public health trust fund that the Legislature would use to distribute grants to the state’s 28 local public health districts.
The fund was envisioned as a depository for about $124 million in extra collections from the state’s share of the 1998 settlement of a lawsuit against the nation’s largest tobacco companies. The first installment arrived April 20, and payments are expected to continue until 2017.
Senators narrowly endorsed the amendment Wednesday. It ran into strong opposition Thursday at the Constitutional Revision Committee’s first hearing on the resolution, with foes saying it would effectively repeal Measure 3, an anti-tobacco initiative that voters approved last November.
Measure 3 established a three-member executive committee to implement a wide-ranging North Dakota tobacco control program. For its financing, the initiative counted on the same share of tobacco lawsuit money that Andrist’s proposed public health fund would have claimed.
After the hearing, two committee members, Reps. Mike Schatz, R-New England, and Lisa Meier, R-Bismarck, pushed to rewrite the proposal as a constitutional amendment to restrict the use of state or local government property for political purposes.
The language in the amendment’s new version is almost identical to a bill the state Senate defeated Tuesday, 41-6. Senators said the measure was too loosely written and could affect free-speech rights.
“My first reaction was, I didn’t believe it,” Andrist said about the wholesale changes to his proposal. “Now, I believe the House can do anything ... How could you even conceive of something like this happening? It’s so far off the wall.”
Andrist introduced the amendment after the House defeated legislation that set aside $12.8 million to finance the newly formed executive committee’s tobacco control program for two years. Senators approved the measure 46-0 on Feb. 17.
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Daily News is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in wahpetondailynews.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the The Daily News. The Daily News does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized The Daily News spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!